Look at the girl’s hair just below the right side of her face. On pic 2 there is a wave of shorter hair highlighted a little by the light, whereas on pic 1 it’s straight down. You would expect that since this part is on the left side of the photo that the merge pic would have inherited pic 1′s straight down hair. But it appears this part of the photo came from pic 2. Its as if the program was choosing the cut line that it went straight down, but then for some reason pick this wave of hair out of pic 2 and superimposed it. I wonder why it would do that.

Picture 1 (pay attention on the right hand side of the picture, the girl’s arm and backgroun)

Picture 2 (pay attention on the right hand side of the picture, notice the door position)

Look at the final picture now

The Left hand side from the final picture is from the left hand side of picture 1
The Right hand side from the final picture is from the right hand side of picture 2
Well….

So it can be done with photoshop easy, right? just merge 2 picture together with a very similar background.

I also notice the middle part of the final picture look a little fuzzy and not natural. I guess that’s the part generate by the program.

I have nothing against the idea and the effect, just think it will be much better if the program actually can swap the face.

Keep it up

Autostich does that:

http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mbrown/autostitch/autostitch.html

I suspect “the rest of us” who do other things besides graphic arts all day will appreciate a tool that helps us fix images easily like this. I don’t give a rat’s butt who created it, so long as it’s affordable and works well.